Competitor profile

S.DHARMARAJ

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
22 May 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.4 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 2.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹1.2 Cr
97.1%
Awarded₹3.4 L2.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.1 Cr97.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹3.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUKRAN ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
02
KUMARAN KUDIL CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RUTHIKA BUILDERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
sastha construction1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS.DHARMARAJ awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to S.DHARMARAJ

About S.DHARMARAJ

S.DHARMARAJ appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹3.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tamilnadu Newsprint and Papers Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUKRAN ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR, KUMARAN KUDIL CONSTRUCTIONS and RUTHIKA BUILDERS. SUKRAN ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; S.DHARMARAJ won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.