Competitor profile

M/s S. C. Agarwal

They win 17% of what they bid, and 21% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
3 Apr 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.8 Cr
of ₹110.2 Cr bid — 20.7% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹110.2 Cr
20.7%
26.9%
52.4%
Awarded₹22.8 Cr20.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹29.6 Cr26.9%
Lost₹57.8 Cr52.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PEE PEE MANDAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹18.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
TEXMACO RAIL AND ENGINEERING LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AYUB ALI & SONS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
JSP Projects Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PREMCO RAIL ENGINEERS LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS. C. Agarwal awardedOthers

About M/s S. C. Agarwal

M/s S. C. Agarwal appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹22.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Apr 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PEE PEE MANDAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, TEXMACO RAIL AND ENGINEERING LTD and AYUB ALI & SONS. PEE PEE MANDAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/s S. C. Agarwal won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.