Competitor profile

S.A. ENTERPRISES

They win 45% of what they bid, and 51% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
31
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.4 Cr
of ₹18.4 Cr bid — 51.1% conversion
Win rate
45.2%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count31 bids
45.2%
45.2%
Awarded1445.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected39.7%
Lost1445.2%
By value₹18.4 Cr
51.1%
48.7%
Awarded₹9.4 Cr51.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.9 Cr48.7%
Lost₹4.4 L0.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹9.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GEEKAY WIRES LIMITED1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹97,468
won head-to-head
02
R K WIRE PRODUCTS LTD4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
03
Nitesh Naveen Udyog4 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹2,386
won head-to-head
04
PRAGATI WIRES PRIVATE LIMITED2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s SWASTIK WIRES0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HIMACHAL WIRE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹261
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS.A. ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About S.A. ENTERPRISES

S.A. ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 45.2% win rate — worth ₹9.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 64.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GEEKAY WIRES LIMITED, R K WIRE PRODUCTS LTD and Nitesh Naveen Udyog. GEEKAY WIRES LIMITED bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; S.A. ENTERPRISES won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.