Competitor profile

ROYAL TRADERS /MARTIN VARGHESE JAMES

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.7 L
of ₹6.5 Cr bid — 8.1% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
40.0%
20.0%
40.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost240.0%
By value₹6.5 Cr
91.9%
Awarded₹52.7 L8.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.0 Cr91.9%
Lost₹860.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹52.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mridul0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Manoj P1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹42
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹84,354
won head-to-head
05
Syamjith S1 win · 1 shared tender
₹11,228
won head-to-head
06
RAJESHKUMAR N1 win · 1 shared tender
₹36
won head-to-head
Rival awardedROYAL TRADERS awardedOthers

About ROYAL TRADERS /MARTIN VARGHESE JAMES

ROYAL TRADERS /MARTIN VARGHESE JAMES appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹52.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is The Kerala Ceramics Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mridul, Manoj P and PULIYANNAVIL ANTONY RESORTS AND CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD. Mridul bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; ROYAL TRADERS /MARTIN VARGHESE JAMES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.