Competitor profile

rithvik construction

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 39% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.7 L
of ₹52.8 L bid — 39.2% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded466.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost233.3%
By value₹52.8 L
39.2%
60.8%
Awarded₹20.7 L39.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹32.1 L60.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AKSHAY CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
NAVMESH DEVELOPERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHREE MAHAKAL ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DIAMOND PAVERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹22.8 L
won head-to-head
05
J N ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
pawan construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedrithvik construction awardedOthers

About rithvik construction

rithvik construction appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹20.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against AKSHAY CONSTRUCTION, NAVMESH DEVELOPERS and SHREE MAHAKAL ENTERPRISES. AKSHAY CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; rithvik construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.