Competitor profile

M/S RITESH ENGINEERING WORKS

They win 9% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
2 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹17.2 L
of ₹3.5 Cr bid — 5.0% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
81.8%
Awarded19.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost981.8%
By value₹3.5 Cr
31.8%
63.3%
Awarded₹17.2 L5.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr31.8%
Lost₹2.2 Cr63.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s K.C. MUDULI1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S AMULYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S SADASHIV ENTERPRISES0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S J B ENTERPRISES1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹99.8 L
won head-to-head
06
S K ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRITESH ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About M/S RITESH ENGINEERING WORKS

M/S RITESH ENGINEERING WORKS appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹17.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Aluminium Company Limited,NALCO, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 51.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s K.C. MUDULI, M/S AMULYA CONSTRUCTION and M/S SADASHIV ENTERPRISES. M/s K.C. MUDULI bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S RITESH ENGINEERING WORKS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.