Competitor profile

RISHI INDUSTRIES

They win 75% of what they bid, but only 65% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.0 L
of ₹30.7 L bid — 65.0% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
75.0%
12.5%
12.5%
Awarded675.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected112.5%
Lost112.5%
By value₹30.7 L
65.0%
32.5%
Awarded₹20.0 L65.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.0 L32.5%
Lost₹76,2002.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HONESTY TRADERS2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.2 L
won head-to-head
02
A Cube (Equip.) Engineers3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹47.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SAI HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹66.2 L
won head-to-head
04
Gangadharan Carpentry Works3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹5.2 L
won head-to-head
05
KUMARAN INDUSTRIES3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹9.3 L
won head-to-head
06
KP Technologies1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRISHI INDUSTRIES awardedOthers

About RISHI INDUSTRIES

RISHI INDUSTRIES appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹20.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Development Commissioner for Handlooms, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HONESTY TRADERS, A Cube (Equip.) Engineers and SAI HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES. HONESTY TRADERS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; RISHI INDUSTRIES won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.