Competitor profile

M/S RISHAV CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
28 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.7 L
of ₹45.5 L bid — 10.3% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹45.5 L
10.2%
89.8%
Awarded₹4.7 L10.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹40.8 L89.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S NIKHIL CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S RAMA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JAI ELECTRICAL CENTRE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹22.5 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S HASAN TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S RAMESH MUNDA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S GAUTAM KUMAR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRISHAV CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S RISHAV CONSTRUCTION

M/S RISHAV CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹4.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 36.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S NIKHIL CONSTRUCTION, M/S RAMA ENTERPRISES and JAI ELECTRICAL CENTRE. M/S NIKHIL CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S RISHAV CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.