Competitor profile

RGC CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 50% of what they bid, and 41% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹36.7 L
of ₹90.3 L bid — 40.7% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost350.0%
By value₹90.3 L
40.7%
59.3%
Awarded₹36.7 L40.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹53.5 L59.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ESHANT BUILDCON0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHRI GURU NANAK CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹21.8 L
won head-to-head
03
MANISH TIWARI CONTRACTOR DAMOH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹24.8 L
won head-to-head
04
SINGHAI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MOKSHDA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.6 L
won head-to-head
06
GANDHI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRGC CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About RGC CONSTRUCTIONS

RGC CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹36.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 87.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ESHANT BUILDCON, SHRI GURU NANAK CONSTRUCTION and MANISH TIWARI CONTRACTOR DAMOH. ESHANT BUILDCON bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; RGC CONSTRUCTIONS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.