Competitor profile

M/s Rawani Construction

They win 44% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.0 Cr
of ₹74.6 Cr bid — 20.1% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
44.4%
55.6%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost555.6%
By value₹74.6 Cr
20.1%
79.9%
Awarded₹15.0 Cr20.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹59.6 Cr79.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD-PIU₹9.9 Cr65.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹15.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMBIKA CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹13.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
KALP CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
HAR GOVIND GUPTA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹10.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAMAY ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M.K.S ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRawani Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Rawani Construction

M/s Rawani Construction appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹15.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD-PIU, at 65.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AMBIKA CONSTRUCTION, KALP CONSTRUCTION and HAR GOVIND GUPTA. AMBIKA CONSTRUCTION bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s Rawani Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.