Competitor profile

RAVINDRA PRATAP SING SIKARWAR

They win 70% of what they bid, but only 7% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
18 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹36.7 L
of ₹4.9 Cr bid — 7.4% conversion
Win rate
70.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
70.0%
20.0%
10.0%
Awarded770.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost110.0%
By value₹4.9 Cr
62.8%
29.7%
Awarded₹36.7 L7.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr62.8%
Lost₹1.5 Cr29.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHUKLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
JAYDEEP UPADHYAY0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SANDEEP UPADHYAY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JAGRATI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TOTAL PIPE INDUSTRIES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
06
RAM NARESH SHARMA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAVINDRA PRATAP awardedOthers

About RAVINDRA PRATAP SING SIKARWAR

RAVINDRA PRATAP SING SIKARWAR appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 70.0% win rate — worth ₹36.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHUKLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, JAYDEEP UPADHYAY and SANDEEP UPADHYAY. SHUKLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; RAVINDRA PRATAP SING SIKARWAR won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.