Competitor profile

RAVINDRA KUMAR JAIN CONTRACTOR

They win 35% of what they bid, and 33% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
17
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹9.1 Cr bid — 32.9% conversion
Win rate
35.3%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
35.3%
58.8%
Awarded635.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost1058.8%
By value₹9.1 Cr
32.9%
67.1%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr32.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.1 Cr67.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GANESH PRASAD TRIPATHI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Maa Pitambra Traders1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹32.6 L
won head-to-head
03
DILIP JAIN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹5,656
won head-to-head
05
MGL GENERAL ELECTRIC0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M A TRADING COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAVINDRA KUMAR awardedOthers

About RAVINDRA KUMAR JAIN CONTRACTOR

RAVINDRA KUMAR JAIN CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 35.3% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GANESH PRASAD TRIPATHI, Maa Pitambra Traders and DILIP JAIN. GANESH PRASAD TRIPATHI bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; RAVINDRA KUMAR JAIN CONTRACTOR won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.