Competitor profile

M/S RATTAN ENTERPRISES

They win 50% of what they bid, and 51% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
5 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹2.7 Cr bid — 51.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost350.0%
By value₹2.7 Cr
51.4%
48.6%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr51.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.3 Cr48.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹1.4 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KRISHNA ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S Pahalwan Construction1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹37.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S. B.S.CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PROJECT ENGINEERING SERVICES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Bhavana Energy Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
CHAMAN ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRATTAN ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S RATTAN ENTERPRISES

M/S RATTAN ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against KRISHNA ENGINEERING WORKS, M/S Pahalwan Construction and M/S. B.S.CONSTRUCTION. KRISHNA ENGINEERING WORKS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S RATTAN ENTERPRISES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.