Competitor profile

M/s Ramsingh Nayak & Sons

They win 75% of what they bid, but only 0.1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
25 Apr 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 L
of ₹10.7 Cr bid — 0.1% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹10.7 Cr
99.9%
Awarded₹1.1 L0.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.7 Cr99.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹1.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s POOJA TENT HOUSE4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹8.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Shri Shyam Contractor3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹8.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s S M GROUP4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹10.3 L
won head-to-head
04
KARAN SINGH4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹17.0 L
won head-to-head
05
jay baba labour supplers3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
06
tej force security service2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRamsingh Nayak awardedOthers

About M/s Ramsingh Nayak & Sons

M/s Ramsingh Nayak & Sons appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹1.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Apr 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan State Gangnagar Sugar Mills, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s POOJA TENT HOUSE, Shri Shyam Contractor and M/s S M GROUP. M/s POOJA TENT HOUSE bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/s Ramsingh Nayak & Sons won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.