Competitor profile

RAMESWAR ENTERPRISE

They win 14% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹32.1 L
of ₹2.2 Cr bid — 14.8% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
Awarded214.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected214.3%
Lost1071.4%
By value₹2.2 Cr
14.8%
77.6%
Awarded₹32.1 L14.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹16.4 L7.6%
Lost₹1.7 Cr77.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

WATCO Bhubaneswar₹15.7 L49.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹32.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kunal Agarwal1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹32.1 L
won head-to-head
02
MANAS KHUNTIA0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
LOPAMUDRA KHUNTIA0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Suraj Pratap Singh1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹17.8 L
won head-to-head
06
SUNITA MISHRA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAMESWAR ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About RAMESWAR ENTERPRISE

RAMESWAR ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹32.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Orissa Bridge and Construction Corporation Ltd, at 51.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Kunal Agarwal, MANAS KHUNTIA and LOPAMUDRA KHUNTIA. Kunal Agarwal bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; RAMESWAR ENTERPRISE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.