Competitor profile

M/S RAM RATTAN SHARMA AND SONS

They win 14% of what they bid, but only 4% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
8 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.5 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 3.6% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
85.7%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost685.7%
By value₹2.1 Cr
96.4%
Awarded₹7.5 L3.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.0 Cr96.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MOHD AYUB BHAT4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹93.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SUNIL KUMAR2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹41.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Nazir Ahmed Naik0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Proch India Infra Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Mohd Ali0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JOGINDER SINGH GOVT. CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAM RATTAN awardedOthers

About M/S RAM RATTAN SHARMA AND SONS

M/S RAM RATTAN SHARMA AND SONS appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹7.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 47.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MOHD AYUB BHAT, SUNIL KUMAR and Nazir Ahmed Naik. MOHD AYUB BHAT bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S RAM RATTAN SHARMA AND SONS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.