Competitor profile

RAM ENTERPRISES

They win 14% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
31 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹30.1 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 17.5% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
85.7%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost685.7%
By value₹1.7 Cr
17.5%
82.5%
Awarded₹30.1 L17.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.4 Cr82.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LEEJA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/s Yash Trading Company0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S MAHIRA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
S.S.ENTERPRISES4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
05
N S ELECTRICALS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Himgiri construction0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAM ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About RAM ENTERPRISES

RAM ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹30.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 83.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against LEEJA ENTERPRISES, M/s Yash Trading Company and M/S MAHIRA ENTERPRISES. LEEJA ENTERPRISES bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; RAM ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.