Competitor profile

Ram Bilas Meena-M/s Mamta Enterprizes

They win 14% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
18 Feb 2013last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.9 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 7.6% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost571.4%
By value₹3.0 Cr
21.6%
70.7%
Awarded₹22.9 L7.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹65.0 L21.6%
Lost₹2.1 Cr70.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹22.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Nirmal Gupta-Payal Electricals0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SACHIN NANDWANA-AMBIKA CORPORATION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹65.0 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHAKUNTLA MEENA-M/S SACHIN CONST.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹26.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRam Bilas Meena-M/s awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Ram Bilas Meena-M/s

About Ram Bilas Meena-M/s Mamta Enterprizes

Ram Bilas Meena-M/s Mamta Enterprizes appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹22.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Feb 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHED-Chief Engineer(HQ),Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mohammad Arif-M/s Mohammad Arif Contractor, Nirmal Gupta-Payal Electricals and SACHIN NANDWANA-AMBIKA CORPORATION. Mohammad Arif-M/s Mohammad Arif Contractor bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Ram Bilas Meena-M/s Mamta Enterprizes won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.