Competitor profile

M/s Rajwar Projects and Infrastructure

They win 35% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

20tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹7.7 Cr bid — 36.2% conversion
Win rate
35.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
35.0%
20.0%
45.0%
Awarded735.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected420.0%
Lost945.0%
By value₹7.7 Cr
36.2%
20.9%
42.9%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr36.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr20.9%
Lost₹3.3 Cr42.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RES - Chief Engineer₹30.4 L10.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹2.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
TRISHIV ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹34.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Jagdish Chandra1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹30.1 L
won head-to-head
03
Sunil Singh3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹28.7 L
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
LAXMAN SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajwar Projects awardedOthers

About M/s Rajwar Projects and Infrastructure

M/s Rajwar Projects and Infrastructure appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 35.0% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 89.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against TRISHIV ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, Jagdish Chandra and Sunil Singh. TRISHIV ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Rajwar Projects and Infrastructure won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.