Competitor profile

RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION

They win 22% of what they bid, and 25% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
10 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.6 Cr
of ₹26.7 Cr bid — 24.6% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
22.2%
11.1%
66.7%
Awarded222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost666.7%
By value₹26.7 Cr
24.6%
15.4%
60.0%
Awarded₹6.6 Cr24.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.1 Cr15.4%
Lost₹16.0 Cr60.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s. Suresh Kumar Gupta3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹12.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Shree Construction0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
YASH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NIYATI CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/s Krishna Construction Co0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KOLI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION

About RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION

RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹6.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s. Suresh Kumar Gupta, Shree Construction and YASH CONSTRUCTION. M/s. Suresh Kumar Gupta bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.