Competitor profile

M/s Rajesh Sharma

They win 60% of what they bid, but only 16% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
8 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹90.7 L
of ₹5.8 Cr bid — 15.5% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
60.0%
20.0%
20.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost120.0%
By value₹5.8 Cr
15.5%
44.2%
40.2%
Awarded₹90.7 L15.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.6 Cr44.2%
Lost₹2.3 Cr40.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹90.7 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Bajrang Agrawal0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AAYAM CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s Shree Om Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHRI RAM CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
YUVRAJ SAHU0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S NEERAJ CHAURASIA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajesh Sharma awardedOthers

About M/s Rajesh Sharma

M/s Rajesh Sharma appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹90.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Bajrang Agrawal, AAYAM CONSTRUCTION and M/s Shree Om Construction. Bajrang Agrawal bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Rajesh Sharma won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.