Competitor profile

M/s Rajendra Kumar Kalyanmal Mantri

They win 11% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
9 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.4 Cr
of ₹60.4 Cr bid — 17.2% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
11.1%
88.9%
Awarded111.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost888.9%
By value₹60.4 Cr
17.2%
82.8%
Awarded₹10.4 Cr17.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹50.0 Cr82.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMIT CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Shree Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Sadanand Babaji Rawool2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹6.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
KCC INFRA PVT LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Manzoor Hussain and sons0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PRAKASH PATIDAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajendra Kumar awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Rajendra Kumar

About M/s Rajendra Kumar Kalyanmal Mantri

M/s Rajendra Kumar Kalyanmal Mantri appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹10.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AMIT CONSTRUCTION, Shree Construction and Sadanand Babaji Rawool. AMIT CONSTRUCTION bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Rajendra Kumar Kalyanmal Mantri won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.