Competitor profile

Rajeev kumar Gupta

They win 32% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
28 May 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0 Cr
of ₹2.7 Cr bid — 37.0% conversion
Win rate
31.6%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count19 bids
31.6%
10.5%
57.9%
Awarded631.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected210.5%
Lost1157.9%
By value₹2.7 Cr
37.0%
23.0%
40.0%
Awarded₹1.0 Cr37.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹63.0 L23.0%
Lost₹1.1 Cr40.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹1.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Uday Engineering Works1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹23.3 L
won head-to-head
02
QMS INDIA LIMITED4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹9.6 L
won head-to-head
03
₹59.2 L
won head-to-head
04
S ENGINEERING WORKS3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹48.2 L
won head-to-head
05
madhuvan enterprise0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
K.P.CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajeev kumar awardedOthers

About Rajeev kumar Gupta

Rajeev kumar Gupta appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 31.6% win rate — worth ₹1.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Uday Engineering Works, QMS INDIA LIMITED and Kadam Engineering and Inspection Consultants. Uday Engineering Works bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Rajeev kumar Gupta won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.