Competitor profile

RAJ KUMAR TYAGI CONTRACTOR

They win 17% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
1 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹13.1 Cr bid — 16.0% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹13.1 Cr
16.0%
84.0%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr16.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3220.0%
Lost₹11.0 Cr84.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

UPRRDA₹2.1 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIPRA CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Shri Shiv Associates0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Mahi Contracter And Associates1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Anil Kumar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Raja Contractors and Engineers1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAJ KUMAR TYAGI awardedOthers

About RAJ KUMAR TYAGI CONTRACTOR

RAJ KUMAR TYAGI CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is UPRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIPRA CONSTRUCTIONS, Shri Shiv Associates and Mahi Contracter And Associates. SHIPRA CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; RAJ KUMAR TYAGI CONTRACTOR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.