Competitor profile

RADHEKRISHNA LAXMI JI SECURITY SERVICES

They win 50% of what they bid — and 66% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
23 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.1 L
of ₹78.8 L bid — 66.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹78.8 L
66.1%
33.9%
Awarded₹52.1 L66.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹26.8 L33.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K C ENTERPRISES PROP. RAHUL SHARMA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹27.9 L
won head-to-head
02
ACTSOCPRO ENVIRONMENT SOLUTIONS LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHIVAAY ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRADHEKRISHNA awardedOthers

About RADHEKRISHNA LAXMI JI SECURITY SERVICES

RADHEKRISHNA LAXMI JI SECURITY SERVICES appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹52.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against K C ENTERPRISES PROP. RAHUL SHARMA, ACTSOCPRO ENVIRONMENT SOLUTIONS LLP and SHIVAAY ENTERPRISES. K C ENTERPRISES PROP. RAHUL SHARMA bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; RADHEKRISHNA LAXMI JI SECURITY SERVICES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.