Competitor profile

R M ENGINEERING WORKS

They win 17% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
9 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.5 L
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 3.2% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
66.7%
16.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected466.7%
Lost116.7%
By value₹2.3 Cr
80.7%
16.1%
Awarded₹7.5 L3.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr80.7%
Lost₹37.3 L16.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹7.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
33ABJFS8228G2ZZ0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M.VELALAGAN ENGINEERING3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
N.B.VEJAIYA NALLASIVAM0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M.BALASUBRAMANIAM0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
S MUTHU0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ALEX FOUNDATION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedR M ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About R M ENGINEERING WORKS

R M ENGINEERING WORKS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹7.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against 33ABJFS8228G2ZZ, M.VELALAGAN ENGINEERING and N.B.VEJAIYA NALLASIVAM. 33ABJFS8228G2ZZ bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; R M ENGINEERING WORKS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.