Competitor profile

QUALITY SCIENTIFIC & MECHANICAL WORKS

They win 50% of what they bid — and 79% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
2 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 78.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹1.9 Cr
78.8%
21.2%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr78.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹39.8 L21.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ARSH TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Healthcare Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MAZING PHARMACEUTICALS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Biomed Instrument0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MICRO MEASURES & INSTRUMENTS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedQUALITY SCIENTIFIC awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to QUALITY SCIENTIFIC

About QUALITY SCIENTIFIC & MECHANICAL WORKS

QUALITY SCIENTIFIC & MECHANICAL WORKS appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Public Health Services Corporation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ARSH TRADERS, Healthcare Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. and Radical Scientific Equipments Pvt. LTd.. ARSH TRADERS bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; QUALITY SCIENTIFIC & MECHANICAL WORKS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.