Competitor profile

Qlab Medical Systems

They win 33% of what they bid, and 43% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.7 L
of ₹64.0 L bid — 43.3% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹64.0 L
43.3%
56.7%
Awarded₹27.7 L43.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹36.3 L56.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

University of Calicut₹27.7 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹27.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Modular Technologies1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹30.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Labmate (Asia ) Pvt Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
TRICORE MEDICAL SYSTEMS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
alife medical systems0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
UNIVERSAL AGENCIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Eppendorf India limited1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedQlab Medical awardedOthers

About Qlab Medical Systems

Qlab Medical Systems appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹27.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is University of Calicut, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Modular Technologies, Labmate (Asia ) Pvt Ltd and TRICORE MEDICAL SYSTEMS. Modular Technologies bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Qlab Medical Systems won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.