Competitor profile

PUSPA CHARAN JAMATIA

They win 56% of what they bid — and 68% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
8 May 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 68.3% conversion
Win rate
55.6%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
55.6%
44.4%
Awarded555.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost444.4%
By value₹1.9 Cr
68.3%
31.7%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr68.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹61.6 L31.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SONADHAN JAMATIA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Ratan Chakma0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
CHHABIR KHAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
HUSSAIN KALAI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ratan Datta0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BIJOY BAHADUR JAMATIA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹6.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPUSPA CHARAN awardedOthers

About PUSPA CHARAN JAMATIA

PUSPA CHARAN JAMATIA appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 55.6% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department, at 56.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SONADHAN JAMATIA, Ratan Chakma and CHHABIR KHAN. SONADHAN JAMATIA bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; PUSPA CHARAN JAMATIA won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.