Competitor profile

PRIYAL CONSTRUCTION

They win 9% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
10 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
23
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹64.9 L
of ₹7.6 Cr bid — 8.6% conversion
Win rate
8.7%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count23 bids
56.5%
34.8%
Awarded28.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1356.5%
Lost834.8%
By value₹7.6 Cr
58.8%
32.6%
Awarded₹64.9 L8.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.5 Cr58.8%
Lost₹2.5 Cr32.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

IRD - Chief Engineer₹44.7 L69.0%
MD- UJVN₹20.1 L31.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹64.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Navneet Kumar3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹58.5 L
won head-to-head
02
Mukesh Kumar Aggarwal1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹37.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Amit Kumar2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹54.8 L
won head-to-head
04
SABOOR INDIA0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ashok Kuamr0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S SURENDRA KUKRETI0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRIYAL CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About PRIYAL CONSTRUCTION

PRIYAL CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 8.7% win rate — worth ₹64.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IRD - Chief Engineer, at 69.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 17.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Navneet Kumar, Mukesh Kumar Aggarwal and Amit Kumar. M/s Navneet Kumar bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; PRIYAL CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.