Competitor profile

PRITAM CONSTRUCTION

They win 63% of what they bid, and 55% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
23 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.9 Cr
of ₹10.8 Cr bid — 54.7% conversion
Win rate
62.5%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count16 bids
62.5%
12.5%
25.0%
Awarded1062.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected212.5%
Lost425.0%
By value₹10.8 Cr
54.7%
19.8%
25.5%
Awarded₹5.9 Cr54.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.1 Cr19.8%
Lost₹2.8 Cr25.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹5.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
nar singh0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MANOJ KUMAR2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Navin Singh Parihar0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAJENDRA RAWAT1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹67.5 L
won head-to-head
05
Varun Trading Company0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HEERA SINGH3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRITAM CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About PRITAM CONSTRUCTION

PRITAM CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 62.5% win rate — worth ₹5.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 90.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against nar singh, MANOJ KUMAR and Navin Singh Parihar. nar singh bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; PRITAM CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.