Competitor profile

PRINCE ENTERPRISES

They win 57% of what they bid, and 64% of the value they chase.

21tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
23 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
21
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.7 Cr
of ₹4.1 Cr bid — 64.4% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count21 bids
57.1%
14.3%
28.6%
Awarded1257.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected314.3%
Lost628.6%
By value₹4.1 Cr
64.4%
27.7%
Awarded₹2.7 Cr64.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹32.7 L7.9%
Lost₹1.1 Cr27.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RSMML₹2.6 Cr98.9%
DLB₹7910.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹2.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ROYAL PRINT TECHNOLOGY0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
dharam agencies2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹50.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Gupta Computers3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Alka Corporation4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹53.4 L
won head-to-head
05
SAHIL ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
E Connect Solutions Pvt Ltd1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹30.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRINCE ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About PRINCE ENTERPRISES

PRINCE ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹2.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RSMML, at 98.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ROYAL PRINT TECHNOLOGY, dharam agencies and Gupta Computers. ROYAL PRINT TECHNOLOGY bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; PRINCE ENTERPRISES won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.