Competitor profile

M/S Prayag Construction

They win 27% of what they bid — and 52% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

30tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
18 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
26
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.9 Cr
of ₹61.9 Cr bid — 51.6% conversion
Win rate
26.9%
of 26 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count26 bids
26.9%
30.8%
42.3%
Awarded726.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected830.8%
Lost1142.3%
By value₹61.9 Cr
51.6%
41.0%
Awarded₹31.9 Cr51.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.6 Cr7.4%
Lost₹25.4 Cr41.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A B CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Neeraj mishra0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
rajan kumar gulani0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S RISHIKESH BUILDERS1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
uma shankar singh rawat0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S Devbhoomi Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPrayag Construction awardedOthers

About M/S Prayag Construction

M/S Prayag Construction appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 26 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 26.9% win rate — worth ₹31.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against A B CONSTRUCTIONS, Neeraj mishra and rajan kumar gulani. A B CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S Prayag Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.