Competitor profile

PRAVAT KUMAR NAYAK

They win 6% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

37tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
11 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
35
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
33 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹25.0 L
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 6.4% conversion
Win rate
5.7%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
94.3%
Awarded25.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3394.3%
By value₹3.9 Cr
93.6%
Awarded₹25.0 L6.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.7 Cr93.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹3.4 L13.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹25.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NARESH CHANDRA SAHOO0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
NISHIKANTA SUTAR0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
UPENDRA KUMAR BISWAL0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PRASANTA KUMAR JENA2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
05
ROHITA KUMAR BARIKA1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹2.9 L
won head-to-head
06
MANISHA SAHOO0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRAVAT KUMAR awardedOthers

About PRAVAT KUMAR NAYAK

PRAVAT KUMAR NAYAK appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 5.7% win rate — worth ₹25.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE BM Baitarani Basin Kenojhar, at 86.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NARESH CHANDRA SAHOO, NISHIKANTA SUTAR and UPENDRA KUMAR BISWAL. NARESH CHANDRA SAHOO bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; PRAVAT KUMAR NAYAK won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.