Competitor profile

Prasad Construction

They win 41% of what they bid, but only 21% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

29tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
26 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹5.1 Cr bid — 21.3% conversion
Win rate
41.4%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count29 bids
41.4%
24.1%
34.5%
Awarded1241.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected724.1%
Lost1034.5%
By value₹5.1 Cr
21.3%
19.5%
59.2%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr21.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹98.7 L19.5%
Lost₹3.0 Cr59.2%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

12 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S. Chatterjee Enterprise0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
suraj kumar dheeraj0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SARVESH JHA0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Akshay Kumar Singh1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹23.3 L
won head-to-head
05
M K CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SUNIL KUMAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPrasad Construction awardedOthers

About Prasad Construction

Prasad Construction appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 41.4% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 59.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S. Chatterjee Enterprise, suraj kumar dheeraj and SARVESH JHA. M/S. Chatterjee Enterprise bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Prasad Construction won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.