Competitor profile

PRAMOD CHILWE-PRAMOD CONSTRUCTION PVT LMT

They win 25% of what they bid — and 67% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
6 Mar 2013last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 Cr
of ₹3.6 Cr bid — 66.6% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹3.6 Cr
66.6%
33.4%
Awarded₹2.4 Cr66.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.2 Cr33.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-MRRDA₹2.4 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mamta Rawat2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹51.2 L
won head-to-head
02
₹38.5 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Subhashchandra Debnath0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Rajesh Biyani0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRAMOD CHILWE-PRAMOD awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to PRAMOD CHILWE-PRAMOD

About PRAMOD CHILWE-PRAMOD CONSTRUCTION PVT LMT

PRAMOD CHILWE-PRAMOD CONSTRUCTION PVT LMT appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹2.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Mar 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-MRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 28.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mamta Rawat, Omprakash Gurbaxani-M/s D C Gurbaxani and Eknath Nivrutti Patil-M/s. E. N. Patil. Mamta Rawat bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; PRAMOD CHILWE-PRAMOD CONSTRUCTION PVT LMT won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.