Competitor profile

Pragya Construction

They win 29% of what they bid — and 58% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
15 Sept 2025last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹5.3 Cr bid — 58.3% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
28.6%
14.3%
57.1%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost457.1%
By value₹5.3 Cr
58.3%
36.9%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr58.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr36.9%
Lost₹25.6 L4.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹3.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GURU KRIPA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Vakrangee Enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹20
won head-to-head
03
M/s Shri Vinayak Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BTC Projects1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.9 L
won head-to-head
05
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Shankar Pal Singh0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPragya Construction awardedOthers

About Pragya Construction

Pragya Construction appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Amber Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GURU KRIPA ENTERPRISES, Vakrangee Enterprises and M/s Shri Vinayak Construction. GURU KRIPA ENTERPRISES bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Pragya Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.