Competitor profile

M/S PODDER CONSTRUCTION

They win 11% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹53.2 L
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 13.6% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
11.1%
44.4%
44.4%
Awarded111.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected444.4%
Lost444.4%
By value₹3.9 Cr
13.6%
39.8%
46.6%
Awarded₹53.2 L13.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr39.8%
Lost₹1.8 Cr46.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹53.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
POULAM SAHA4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MD SAFIQUL ISLAM0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Subhajit Saha0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SATYANANDA SHARMA2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹40.6 L
won head-to-head
05
UTPAL LASKAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BARUN KUMAR SAHA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPODDER CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S PODDER CONSTRUCTION

M/S PODDER CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹53.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director (Urban Development Department), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against POULAM SAHA, MD SAFIQUL ISLAM and Subhajit Saha. POULAM SAHA bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S PODDER CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.