Competitor profile

M/s Piyush Enterprises

They win 21% of what they bid, but only 5% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
19 Jan 2025last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 Cr
of ₹86.0 Cr bid — 4.6% conversion
Win rate
21.4%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
21.4%
14.3%
64.3%
Awarded321.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected214.3%
Lost964.3%
By value₹86.0 Cr
45.4%
50.0%
Awarded₹3.9 Cr4.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹39.0 Cr45.4%
Lost₹43.0 Cr50.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S K PARMAR1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ASHOK D RATHOD0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M.M.TANK0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Rajrath Construction1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
API CIVILCON PVT1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Ekta Construction1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹64.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPiyush Enterprises awardedOthers

About M/s Piyush Enterprises

M/s Piyush Enterprises appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 21.4% win rate — worth ₹3.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Jan 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is UT Administration of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Dadra And Nagar Haveli. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S K PARMAR, ASHOK D RATHOD and M.M.TANK. S K PARMAR bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Piyush Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.