Competitor profile

Perfect Building Solution, Kota

They win 75% of what they bid, and 77% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 Apr 2019last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹41.7 L
of ₹53.8 L bid — 77.4% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹53.8 L
77.4%
22.6%
Awarded₹41.7 L77.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹12.1 L22.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹41.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vaibhav Enterprises0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KHEMA SHANKAR SHARMA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GURU KRIPA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Vikrant Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S A.V.CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Hukam Chand Gaur0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPerfect Building awardedOthers

About Perfect Building Solution, Kota

Perfect Building Solution, Kota appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹41.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Apr 2019.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University-Kota, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Vaibhav Enterprises, KHEMA SHANKAR SHARMA and GURU KRIPA ENTERPRISES. Vaibhav Enterprises bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Perfect Building Solution, Kota won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.