Competitor profile

Pawan Singh Govt.Contractor

They win 15% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

21tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
20
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹47.5 L
of ₹3.6 Cr bid — 13.3% conversion
Win rate
15.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
15.0%
80.0%
Awarded315.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.0%
Lost1680.0%
By value₹3.6 Cr
13.3%
13.7%
73.0%
Awarded₹47.5 L13.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48.9 L13.7%
Lost₹2.6 Cr73.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹47.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CHETAN CHAUHAN3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹6.6 L
won head-to-head
02
SUNI RAM0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
LABOUR SUPPLY MATE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.5 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Nitika Enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹51.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPawan Singh awardedOthers

About Pawan Singh Govt.Contractor

Pawan Singh Govt.Contractor appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 15.0% win rate — worth ₹47.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against CHETAN CHAUHAN, SUNI RAM and LABOUR SUPPLY MATE. CHETAN CHAUHAN bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Pawan Singh Govt.Contractor won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.