Competitor profile

PAWAN KUMAR ANEJA

They win 50% of what they bid, and 49% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Jun 2021last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹90.0 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 49.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹1.8 Cr
49.5%
50.5%
Awarded₹90.0 L49.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹92.0 L50.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹90.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NAVNEET KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Nitin Garg0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ASHOK KUMAR GOEL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
VINOD GABA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹92.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Himanshu Garg0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Charit Gilhotra0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPAWAN KUMAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to PAWAN KUMAR

About PAWAN KUMAR ANEJA

PAWAN KUMAR ANEJA appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹90.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jun 2021.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Housing Board, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NAVNEET KUMAR, Nitin Garg and ASHOK KUMAR GOEL. NAVNEET KUMAR bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; PAWAN KUMAR ANEJA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.