Competitor profile

M/S PAWAN CONSTRUCTION

They win 4% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

26tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
9 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
25
26 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹51.9 Cr bid — 2.6% conversion
Win rate
4.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count25 bids
80.0%
16.0%
Awarded14.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2080.0%
Lost416.0%
By value₹51.9 Cr
83.8%
13.6%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr2.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹43.5 Cr83.8%
Lost₹7.1 Cr13.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RCD EinC₹1.3 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹5.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RAHUL RISHI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KAMAL KISHOR SINGH0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
VIRAAJ ENGICON PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
barasi infratech private limited0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S BISHWAKARMA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPAWAN CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S PAWAN CONSTRUCTION

M/S PAWAN CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 26 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 4.0% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RCD EinC, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY, RAHUL RISHI ENTERPRISES and KAMAL KISHOR SINGH. M/S SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S PAWAN CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.