Competitor profile

PAWAN AND SONS

They win 42% of what they bid, but only 31% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

12tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹5.3 Cr bid — 31.5% conversion
Win rate
41.7%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
41.7%
50.0%
Awarded541.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected18.3%
Lost650.0%
By value₹5.3 Cr
31.5%
14.6%
53.9%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr31.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹77.8 L14.6%
Lost₹2.9 Cr53.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJ RAJESHWARI GROUPS1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹77.8 L
won head-to-head
02
B M CONSTRUCTION AND TRADING COMPANY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M M CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹67.5 L
won head-to-head
04
B.S.K. CIVITECH PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Kakda Infra Projects PVT Ltd0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAHUL SINGH RAGHUWANSHI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPAWAN AND SONS awardedOthers

About PAWAN AND SONS

PAWAN AND SONS appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 41.7% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD- Roads and Bridges, at 93.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJ RAJESHWARI GROUPS, B M CONSTRUCTION AND TRADING COMPANY and M M CONSTRUCTION. RAJ RAJESHWARI GROUPS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; PAWAN AND SONS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.