Competitor profile

PARVEEZ AHMAD DAR

They win 50% of what they bid, and 51% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
20 Aug 2014last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.8 L
of ₹11.3 L bid — 51.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹11.3 L
51.0%
49.0%
Awarded₹5.8 L51.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.5 L49.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹5.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kamil Fayaz-KAMIL FAYAZ WAIDA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Mohd Maqbool Ganai0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BASHIR AHMAD MIR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ALI MOHAMMAD BHAT-ALI MOHAMMAD BHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MIR ASHRAF-MIR MOHAMMAD ASHRAF1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.5 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S GHULAM MOHIUDIN YATOO0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPARVEEZ AHMAD awardedOthers

About PARVEEZ AHMAD DAR

PARVEEZ AHMAD DAR appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹5.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Kamil Fayaz-KAMIL FAYAZ WAIDA, Mohd Maqbool Ganai and BASHIR AHMAD MIR. Kamil Fayaz-KAMIL FAYAZ WAIDA bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; PARVEEZ AHMAD DAR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.