Competitor profile

paras udyog

They win 44% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
2 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹98.1 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 34.9% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
44.4%
50.0%
Awarded844.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.6%
Lost950.0%
By value₹2.8 Cr
34.9%
62.9%
Awarded₹98.1 L34.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.3 L2.2%
Lost₹1.8 Cr62.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
kathan construcation2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹42.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SANJAY SHARMA1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹8.8 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S NILESH PATWA1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹8.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Anpurna and Company0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NANDKISHOR SHARMA2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹21.5 L
won head-to-head
06
Anurag And Sons0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedparas udyog awardedOthers

About paras udyog

paras udyog appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹98.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against kathan construcation, SANJAY SHARMA and M/S NILESH PATWA. kathan construcation bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; paras udyog won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.