Competitor profile

M/S PANDEY ENTERPRISES

They win 37% of what they bid, and 33% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
9 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹5.3 Cr bid — 33.1% conversion
Win rate
36.8%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count19 bids
36.8%
36.8%
26.3%
Awarded736.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected736.8%
Lost526.3%
By value₹5.3 Cr
33.1%
43.6%
23.3%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr33.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 Cr43.6%
Lost₹1.2 Cr23.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zila Parishad Palamau₹1.5 Cr85.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹1.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s YASHODA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹24.6 L
won head-to-head
02
ADITYA RAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MD HAIDAR ALI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AMIT KUMAR SAHU0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s CHANDRA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹29.3 L
won head-to-head
06
A.M. PRESTIGE INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPANDEY ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S PANDEY ENTERPRISES

M/S PANDEY ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 36.8% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zila Parishad Palamau, at 85.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s YASHODA CONSTRUCTION, ADITYA RAJ CONSTRUCTION and MD HAIDAR ALI. M/s YASHODA CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S PANDEY ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.