Competitor profile

M/s. P. K. NAYAK & CO.

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
13 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 1.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹2.0 Cr
89.0%
Awarded₹3.3 L1.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr89.0%
Lost₹18.5 L9.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A MITTAL AND ASSOCIATES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
CHATTERJEE GAZI AND ASSOCIATES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Vijay Garg & Associates1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
04
M B Gabhawala and Co1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
05
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
06
AJAY GUPTA1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedP. K. NAYAK awardedOthers

About M/s. P. K. NAYAK & CO.

M/s. P. K. NAYAK & CO. appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹3.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against A MITTAL AND ASSOCIATES, CHATTERJEE GAZI AND ASSOCIATES and Vijay Garg & Associates. A MITTAL AND ASSOCIATES bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s. P. K. NAYAK & CO. won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.