Competitor profile

P.G.INFRASTRUCTURE

They win 43% of what they bid, and 53% of the value they chase.

32tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
30
32 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.8 Cr
of ₹7.3 Cr bid — 52.5% conversion
Win rate
43.3%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count30 bids
43.3%
53.3%
Awarded1343.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.3%
Lost1653.3%
By value₹7.3 Cr
52.5%
43.4%
Awarded₹3.8 Cr52.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹29.9 L4.1%
Lost₹3.1 Cr43.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

13 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Swami Enterprises1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹21.0 L
won head-to-head
02
m/s parmod kamar1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹31.8 L
won head-to-head
03
Parveen Kumar0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Gautam Electro Engineers2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹20.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Ashwani Kumar0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AMIT LAMBA0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedP.G.INFRASTRUCTURE awardedOthers

About P.G.INFRASTRUCTURE

P.G.INFRASTRUCTURE appears as a bidder on 32 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 43.3% win rate — worth ₹3.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Swami Enterprises, m/s parmod kamar and Parveen Kumar. Swami Enterprises bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; P.G.INFRASTRUCTURE won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.