Competitor profile

Oriental Constructions

They win 14% of what they bid — and 37% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

93tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
90
93 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
74 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹21.8 Cr
of ₹59.0 Cr bid — 36.9% conversion
Win rate
14.4%
of 90 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count90 bids
14.4%
82.2%
Awarded1314.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected33.3%
Lost7482.2%
By value₹59.0 Cr
36.9%
15.2%
47.9%
Awarded₹21.8 Cr36.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.0 Cr15.2%
Lost₹28.2 Cr47.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

13 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS BUILDERS3 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ANIE JOHN CONTRACTORS7 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Bell Builders3 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Anaswara Constructions4 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
S&C ENTERPRISES6 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Aarjay Tech Engineering1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹36.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOriental Constructions awardedOthers

About Oriental Constructions

Oriental Constructions appears as a bidder on 93 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 90 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 14.4% win rate — worth ₹21.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Dte General Border Roads Organisation, at 78.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS BUILDERS, ANIE JOHN CONTRACTORS and Bell Builders. MS BUILDERS bid on 28 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Oriental Constructions won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.